|
updated
14/9/01
Another
side to man’s best friend
TV review by Nick Mays
Deadly Dogs - Granada TV, Produced
& Directed by Emma Hawley,
Channel 5, Sunday, 9th September 2001
IT
HAS some time since there was a serious TV documentary into the emotive
subject of ‘dangerous dogs’. Despite its rather lurid title, ‘Deadly Dogs’,
made by Granada TV and screened last Sunday on Channel 5 was, on the whole,
an intelligent and varied look at the cause of dog attacks and an examination
of various dog laws around the world.
OUR
DOGS was instrumental in providing the programme makers with much of the
information about the UK’s own Dangerous Dogs Act and the more recent
German ‘Fighting Dog’ legislation, both of which featured heavily in the
broadcast programme.
The
opening narrative, over scenes of dogs playing and walking happily with
their owners and children said: “Dogs have stolen our hearts and homes...
We live cheek by jowl with seven million of them, But what happens when
they turn on us?”
The
first case study in a dog attack was that of four year-old Ruth Fowler
who was attacked in her back garden by ‘Blue’, her uncle’s Neapolitan
Mastiff. Her uncle had bought the dog instead of a puppy because he felt
sorry for it. Although Blue had proved to be a loving family pet, displaying
no aggression, he still ‘turned’ one day, probably mistaking Ruth’s plaited
ponytail for his tug-rope.
The
little girl’s head was held in the dog’s jaws, its teeth tearing strips
of flesh from her scalp and puncturing the bone so as to expose the lining
of the brain. Ruth’s mother managed to free her daughter from the dog’s
jaws and rush her to hospital, where she was saved thanks to the skill
of medical staff. Blue was immediately put to sleep.
Ruth
has undergone plastic surgery since then and, although her physical scars
have healed, the mental scars, including frequent nightmares, remain.
“Blue was lovely,” says Ruth’s mother. “But nowadays, if anyone says to
me their dog won’t bite or turn, I just don’t believe it.”
There
followed an explanation of how, following a spate of dog attacks in the
late 1980s, the Conservative Government introduced the Dangerous Dogs
Act in 1991, largely directed towards Pit Bull Terriers. Although the
programme did not mention the seizure of innocent family pets which merely
resembled Pit Bulls, it pointed out that the DDA had not worked because
it was Breed-Specific.
Breed
specific
Chris
Laurence of the RSPCA said “The reason the Act does not work is because
it is breed specific. You cannot say that all Pit Bulls are nasty and
all Golden Retrievers are nice. It just isn’t so.”
Next
up was Terry Singh, Dog Warden Manager for Bradford explaining how he
could use the DDA to round up any aggressive latchkey dogs in the city.
He pointed out that there were approximately 10,000 latchkey dogs in the
city - a fifth of the total dog population.
A
lengthy section on the German ‘Fighting Dog’ laws followed, showing graphic
news footage of the scene in a Hamburg playground where six year-old Volkan
Kaja was killed by a Pit Bull and an Amstaff, both of which were shot
dead by police.
“Overnight
dogs became Public Enemy No 1” ran the narrative, cutting to the story
of “Asterix”, a Mastiff type who as guarding his owner’s factory on the
day news of Volkan’s death broke. Heidrun Wagner found Asterix lying in
a pool of his own blood, the dog having been stabbed through the bars
of the fence. Luckily, he survived, but the attack showed just how high
public feeling was running.
An
examination of the German legislation revealed the loaded “Character Test”
which all dogs have to undergo.
“Rocky”,
an Amstaff owned by Veronika Dewald of Wiesbaden was shown being tested
by official dog tester Manfred Willnat. “If a dog shows high aggression
in the test, then he can show it in other circumstances,” he said. Luckily,
Rocky passed his test - but only just, with Herr Willnat giving the dire
warning that the dog was a borderline case.
Veronica
Dewald bemoaned the fact that non-dog owners took the view that all dogs
were killers, and how she was made, as the owner of a listed breed, to
have a large sign on her door saying ‘Beware of the Dangerous Dog’.
Sad
Campaigner
Gabi Woiwode spoke at length, very eloquently pointing out that “our politicians
are creating the same kind of hatred and oppression (towards dog owners)
as we have seen in our history.”
The
case of retired nurse Vera Moc-Rossu who was roughly handcuffed by police
officers as they searched her apartment for her ‘dangerous dog’ Paul was
touched upon, as was the brutal shooting of ‘Zeus’, a large crossbreed
who was alleged to have picked up a dog walker’s Cavalier King Charles
Spaniel in its mouth.
One
of the saddest sights of all was the ‘canine concentration camp’ in Hamburg,
where rows and rows of small metal pens held dogs which were awaiting
decisions on their fate. Many were former pets of people who had failed
their own ‘Character Test’ and had proved not to be responsible owners
in they eyes of the law. The Kennel Manager pointed out that the dogs
had no quality of life and it was as much as his staff could do just to
feed and care for the dogs.
Gabi
Woiwode was again quoted; “Other countries are following suit with the
German dog laws, Dogs are now our enemies.”
The
second half of the programme turned its attention to trained fighting
dogs and a genuinely gruesome dog attack which resulted in the death of
a 33 year-old woman from San Francisco, as well as training methods to
prevent canine aggression.
(Part
Two will be reviewed in next week’s issue of OUR DOGS)

|