Government
red tape could spell the end for some general championship
and major open shows as well as country fairs and village
fetes, writes Frank Jackson.
The Government is currently formulating new planning controls
that could put an end to many well established dog shows as
well as village fetes, country fairs and other events essential
to a healthy rural tourism and entertainment industry.
At the moment land can be used on a strictly temporary basis
without planning permission for up to 14 or 28 days a year.
The Government has now announced its intention to allow even
temporary use only on the basis of full planning permission.
The Country Landowners Association has expressed deep concern
about the Governments proposals.
Events like village fetes and clay pigeon shoots are
some of the mainstays of life in the countryside and rural
communities. It is crazy to suggest that planning permission
should be needed to hold a country fair or fete that might
typically consist of a childrens fancy dress parade,
a coconut shy, a skittles alley, tombola, a bric-a-brac stall
and a few other games and stands, said Peter Geldart,
East Midlands regional CLA director.
Existing temporary use rights underpin many community
events and are an extremely valuable asset to farmers and
rural business in these difficult times for agriculture. They
generate income for charities, business and the wider rural
economy.
The research report on which the Government has based
its proposals is, at best, flimsy and fails to provide any
evidence of a real problem. Only 98 out of 388 local authorities
nationwide responded to the Governments research and,
of those, only 30 identified temporary use as a problem. There
is no need for new regulations: existing controls are sufficient
to take account of isolated problems.
Removal of these rights will affect numerous temporary
uses of land, including traditional summer village fetes,
markets, shoots and shows. We all know that, if such temporary
uses are brought under planning control, there will be extra
costs for application fees, delays in appeals and ultimately
possible refusal of consent for some events. The Government
should resist the temptation to interfere.
If the Government decides that all outdoor events must have
full planning permission it is entirely likely that ten or
more major general championship shows and a great many open
shows, including some that own their own sites or operate
as part of a larger organisation that owns its own site, will
be affected. Some will be forced to relocate or disappear
from the show scene.
If the Kennel Club is aware of the imminent danger it has
not yet warned the shows most likely to be affected and has
not said that it is doing anything to counter the threat,
yet this could be the biggest threat faced by dog shows for
a number of years.