Scottish
puppy farmer’s lenient sentence slammed
THE
TRIAL of a man named as one of the key players behind the
illegal puppy trade in Scotland was heard by Stranraer Sheriff
Court last week, despite having previously been adjourned
until the New Year.
As reported previously John Walsh, 52, was arrested after
leaving the port of Cairn Ryan with 49 puppies in the back
of a van on July 18th, believed to have been illegally imported
from Ireland as part of the flourishing undercover trade in
dogs, many of which are sold on the British mainland and in
the Middle East.
Walsh, from Brampton, Cumbria was prosecuted and appeared
at Stranraer Sheriff Court on Tuesday 29 July 2003, where
he pleaded not guilty.
Last week, the prosecution accepted a plea of guilty to Protection
of Animals (Scotland) Act 1912 section 11(b) in that he did
transport the animals which caused suffering. On all other
charges – those of animal welfare breaches - Walsh’s
plea of not guilty was accepted. The court fined Walsh £500
and effectively freed him to continue his illegal trade.
Ken McKie, Secretary of the anti-puppy farm group Waterside
Action Group slammed the court’s decision. Mr McKie
told OUR DOGS: "WAG are appalled and disappointed at
the lenient sentence given out to John Walsh at Stranraer
Sheriff Court today. The £500 fine is only the price
of one puppy to this man. He avoided a ban on animals by plying
a sob story to the court.
"In fact this man had been sentenced to two months imprisonment
over a Foot and Mouth outbreak in Northern Ireland. This is
not a poor animal trader this is a criminal! We will be asking
that the Crown Office challenge this very lenient sentence
in respect of a ban from keeping animals. This has to be done
as the sentence received sends out the wrong message to people
like Walsh who make ample amounts of money out of the suffering
of poor animals. Animals that have had only a few weeks of
life and then endure the miserable existence being transported
by the ‘caring’ dealer like Mr Walsh who, during
the video taken by the police, spent more time drinking water
rather than give this to the urine sodden, faeces covered
puppies that he had illegally transported. It must be seen
that this will only be the first of many convictions that
will hopefully become commonplace."
Mr McKie added that WAG were planning to push the Crown Office
for an appeal against the sentence.
"What we are now gearing up to do is to 'encourage' the
crown office to appeal his sentence and ask for a ban for
keeping animals.
"WAG have drafted a letter to be sent to our supporters
and added to our web site for them to correspond with the
crown office and endeavour to have this conviction appealed
on the grounds of leneincy.
"We would invite all dog lovers to use our letter as
a template and write to the Lord Advocate to call for the
case to be appealed. Justice must be seen to be done, for
the dogs’ sakes."
This
is a template of the letter that WAG is asking supporters
to send to the Crown Office to appeal against John Walsh’s
lenient sentence:
Lord Advocate
Crown Office
25 Chambers Street
EDINBURGH
EH1 1LA
Dear Sir,
PF –v – John Walsh
I am/we are writing to express our concerns over the lenient
sentence meted out to the above person in Stranraer Sheriff
Court on 11 November 2003.
It is my/our opinion that this sentence was extremely lenient
given that by past conduct he has shown total disregard for
the welfare of animals in any way. This sentence will be totally
ineffective against this man and the only way that the public
and animals can be protected will be to have this sentence
changed to include a ban from keeping animals.
I/we hope you can assist the public in this matter as I am/we
are incensed by this and can only hope that the public opinion
will be rewarded by your efforts.