A
LEADING airline has banned five breeds of dog from being carried
as cargo on its services after an incident involving
one dog of unspecified breed. The new policy has been denounced
by campaigners as "Breed Specific Legislation in the
private sector."
American Airlines announced its new policy on August 7th.
An internal American Airlines Cargo Service Advisory bulletin
stated: "Effective Immediately, the following restrictions
are in Place. American Airlines will no longer accept the
following breeds of dogs:
American Pit Bull Terrier; American Staffor(d)shire Terrier
(sic); Bull Terrier; Doberman Pinscher; Rottweiler.
The statement continues:
"Puppies of these breeds between 8 & 12 weeks of
age may be accepted. The breed and age of the dog must be
indicated on the health certificate. Crossbreeds containing
one of the above breeds, whenindicated on the health certificate
are also prohibited."
The message was soon flashed across the Internet via the anti-BSL
group DogHolocaust
Restrictions
OUR
DOGS contacted Jennifer Pemberton of American Airlines Cargo
division regarding the new restrictions. Ms Pemberton said:
"American Airlines Cargo recently made a change in its
Live Animal Acceptance Policy to restrict certain canine breeds
which experts consider to be aggressive in nature. We regret
that this may cause inconvenience to our customers who depend
on American for this cargo service. The new policy was adopted
for safety reasons, due to an unfortunate incident involving
an aggressive breed dog. No affront is intended toward the
specified restricted breeds.
"American Airlines was the first airline to develop rigid
standards for the safe transportation of animals and this
decision is an extension of that commitment. We have many
animal lovers who work for American Airlines, as well as many
employee dog owners. The objectives associated with our animal
acceptance policy are to transport animals safely. We trust
you understand that safety is American Airlines number one
priority."
The statement relayed by Ms Pemberton was roundly denounced
by anti-BSL campaigners and dog owners across the world. One
correspondent to the DogHolocaust List summed up the feelings
of many, saying: "If the airline can ban breeds
of dog because of an incident with one animal, then why haven't
they banned all Muslims after the terrorist attacks on 9-11?
Same thing. Safety is their number one priority? Laughable!"
OUR DOGS responded to Ms Pemberton with a number of questions
as to the background to their policy, which included a query
as to which experts defined the five listed breeds
as dangerous and on what scientific basis this
decision was reached.
However, at the time of going to press, no response had been
received. However, OUR DOGS hope to include American Airlines
response in next weeks issue.